ATTACHMENT OF DEBT AND CAD ORDER

Mitsui E&S Power Systems Inc v Neptun International Pte Ltd and another (DBS Bank Ltd, non-party) [2024] SGHCR 3 was an application by the Non-Party, DBS Bank Ltd (“DBS”), for the release of an attached debt from attachment on the basis that the Commercial Affairs Department (“CAD”) had directed DBS not to allow any dealings with the monies standing in Neptun International Pte Ltd’s (“Neptun”) account with DBS (“Account”) (“CAD Order”).

Read More
Xian Ying Tan
ENFORCEABILITY OF RESTRAINT OF TRADE CLAUSES

Restraint of trade clauses are often found in employment contracts and they can be contentious. This week’s blog covers Shopee Singapore Private Limited v Lim Teck Yong [2024] SGHC 29, a High Court (the “Court”) case on the enforceability of such restraint of trade clauses in a contract between Shopee Singapore Pte Ltd and one of its former employees.

Read More
Xian Ying Tan
STAY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE ARBITRATION ACT

Often, construction contracts in Singapore are subject to arbitration. It is then frequently assumed that as a result of this, all disputes arising from the contract would be dealt with in arbitration. The recent case of Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd v Crystal-Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd [2024] SGHCR 2 is a reminder that this may not always be the case.

Read More
Xian Ying Tan
PERFORMANCE BOND & COTMA RELIEF

Can a contractor restrain a call on a performance bond made by the employer on the ground that the architect had failed to take into account the contractor’s application for relief under the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020? This issue arose for consideration in Shanghai Chong Kee Furniture & Construction Pte Ltd v Church of St Teresa [2024] SGHC 5.

Read More
Xian Ying Tan
CLAIMING DAMAGES FOR PSYCHIATRIC HARM OR ILLNESS AGAINST A DEFENDANT WHOSE NEGLIGENCE CAUSED THE DEATH OF A CLOSE RELATIVE

This week’s blog covers Paul and another (Appellants) v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2024] UKSC 1, a decision from the United Kingdom Supreme Court (the “UK Court”) which discusses whether, as a question of law, a claimant can claim damages for psychiatric harm suffered as a result of witnessing the death of a close relative from a medical condition which the defendant has negligently failed to diagnose and treat.

Read More
Xian Ying Tan