BE AWARE OF YOUR DATA PROTECTION OBLIGATIONS WHEN ENGAGING THIRD PARTY VENDORS

Organisations who engage external vendors to develop websites for them have to be aware of the data protection obligations owed under the Personal Data Protection Act (“PDPA”). This is especially so in relation to client’s personal data, as exemplified in the recent decision by the Personal Data Protection Commission (“PDPC”) in EU Holidays Pte. Ltd. [2019] SGPDPC 38 (“EU Holidays”).

Read More
Crystl Hsu
SETTING ASIDE OF ARBITRAL AWARD – BRQ AND ANOTHER V BRS AND ANOTHER AND ANOTHER MATTER [2019] SGHC 260

Is the three-month time limit stipulated in Art 34(3) of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the “Model Law”) a strict time limit? And when does the time begin to run if a party has made a request under Art 33 of the Model Law? These issues were considered and addressed by the High Court in BRQ and another v BRS and another and another matter [2019] SGHC 260 (“BRQ v BRS”).  

Read More
Crystl Hsu
ORO NEGRO DRILLING PTE LTD AND OTHERS V INTEGRADORA DE SERVICIOS PETROLEROS ORO NEGRO SAPI DE CV AND OTHERS AND ANOTHER APPEAL (JESUS ANGEL GUERRA MENDEZ, NON-PARTY) [2019] SGCA 74

This article focuses on the Court of Appeal’s views on the nature of an anti-suit injunction in the recent decision of Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd and others v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro SAPI de CV and others and another appeal (Jesus Angel Guerra Mendez, non-party) [2019] SGCA 74 (“Oro Drilling v Integradora”).

Read More
Crystl Hsu
A TALE OF TWO SOP ADS – A FINALE

In the recent decision of Harmonious Coretrades Pte Ltd v United Integrated Services Pte Ltd [2019] SGCA 77, the Court of Appeal clarified the effect of a subsequent adjudication determination on the enforcement of a prior adjudication determination.

Read More
Crystl Hsu
LITIGATING FOR VINDICATION REQUIRES SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES

In TMT Asia Limited v BHP Billiton Marketing AG (Singapore Branch) and Anor [2019] SGCA 60 (“TMT v BHPM”), the Singapore Court of Appeal did not allow an action to continue when an offer to settle would have given the plaintiff all the compensatory reliefs it sought, as there was no practical benefit to be gained.

Read More
Crystl Hsu
ADDLESEE V DENTONS EUROPE LLP [2019] EWCA CIV 1600

When a company has been dissolved, what happens to the legal advice privilege attaching to the communications between the company and its lawyers? This issue was considered by the English Court of Appeal in its decision of Addlesee v Dentons Europe LLP [2019] EWCA Civ 1600 (“Addlesee”).

Read More
Crystl Hsu
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK, SINGAPORE BRANCH V CHUA SENG KIAT (LIM PENG LIANG DAVID LLEWELLYN, INTERVENER) [2019] SGHC 240

In the recent decision of Standard Chartered Bank, Singapore Branch v Chua Seng Kiat (Lim Peng Liang David Llewellyn, intervener) [2019] SGHC 240 (“SCB v CSK”) the High Court dismissed an appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s decision to annul a bankruptcy order made against the Respondent, before all the debts in the bankruptcy had been proven.

Read More
Crystl Hsu
THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE (AMENDMENT) BILL

As widely reported in the news, the Supreme Court of Judicature (Amendment) Bill (Bill No. 32/2019) (the “SCJA Amendment Bill”) was tabled by the Ministry of Law and submitted for first reading on 7 October 2019. The SCJA Amendment Bill will effect numerous changes to the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (the “SCJA”). 

Read More
Crystl Hsu